Example report

Maple Courtyard Residences

1842 Maple Avenue, Fort Worth, TX

Issues FoundMultifamilyFull Plan Review

Overall score

82/100

Composite compliance score

Violations

Items requiring correction

Warnings

Recommended clarifications

Passed checks

Checks that currently comply

Executive Summary

High-level AI-assisted review summary for the current plan set.

The submitted plan appears generally aligned with zoning and development standards, but several issues require correction before submission. Rear setback and parking counts do not currently meet the applicable standards, and several documentation clarifications are recommended before resubmittal.

Violations

Issues requiring correction before submission or approval.

Rear Setback

Sec. 4.2.3

The site plan indicates the principal structure extends five feet into the required rear setback area for this zoning district.

Major

Required value

20 ft

Detected value

15 ft

Suggested correction

Increase the rear setback to 20 ft minimum or provide a variance strategy with supporting justification.

Parking Requirement

Table 6.1

Based on the submitted unit count and use classification, the plan falls short of the minimum off-street parking requirement.

Moderate

Required value

8 spaces

Detected value

6 spaces

Suggested correction

Add 2 parking spaces or document a compliant shared parking reduction path for staff review.

Warnings

Recommended clarifications to strengthen the next submittal.

Dumpster screening details

Sec. 7.4.8

The enclosure location is shown, but the elevation and material detail are not fully documented.

Recommended action

Add screening elevation and gate material notes to the next submittal set.

Open space labeling

Sec. 5.3.2

Common open space areas are graphically shown, but the tabulated square footage is not identified on the cover sheet.

Recommended action

Label amenity and open space calculations directly on the plan summary sheet.

Facade articulation note

FBC 3.7

The elevations suggest compliant massing, but material break dimensions are not called out.

Recommended action

Add dimensioned facade offsets and material transition callouts for faster review.

Passed Checks

Standards that currently appear compliant.

Maximum building height

Lot coverage

Front setback

Landscape buffer

Extracted Plan Data

Structured data captured from the uploaded plan set.

Lot area12,400 sq ft

Building area6,780 sq ft

Number of units8

Parking spaces6

Building height34 ft

Front setback24 ft

Side setback8 ft

Rear setback15 ft

Reviewer Notes

Copy-ready notes to support permit response drafting.

Reviewer-style notes

Ready to adapt into a permit response letter.

Revise the site plan to demonstrate the minimum 20-foot rear setback required by Sec. 4.2.3 or submit a variance request narrative addressing the encroachment.

Provide an updated parking exhibit confirming the minimum required 8 spaces, or include a shared parking analysis if relying on a reduction mechanism.

Supplement the next submittal with complete screening details, open space calculations, and facade articulation notes to reduce follow-up comments.